Re: [PATCH 21/37] drivers/ata: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device

2010-03-11 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Grant Likely wrote: .node is being removed Signed-off-by: Grant Likely --- drivers/ata/pata_macio.c |2 +- drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c |2 +- drivers/ide/pmac.c | 10 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Should probably hav

Re: [PATCH 21/37] drivers/ata: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device

2010-03-11 Thread David Miller
From: Sergei Shtylyov Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:31:14 +0300 > Should probably have been 2 patches instead of one, as drivers/ata/ > and drivers/ide/ are different subsystems... No, he should consolidate these changes _MORE_ not less. The patch set is already too large to review at it is! __

Re: [PATCH 21/37] drivers/ata: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device

2010-03-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 03/11/2010 01:31 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Hello. Grant Likely wrote: .node is being removed Signed-off-by: Grant Likely --- drivers/ata/pata_macio.c | 2 +- drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c | 2 +- drivers/ide/pmac.c | 10 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Should

[PATCH 21/37] drivers/ata: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device

2010-03-11 Thread Grant Likely
.node is being removed Signed-off-by: Grant Likely --- drivers/ata/pata_macio.c |2 +- drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c |2 +- drivers/ide/pmac.c | 10 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_macio.c b/drivers/ata/pata