On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:05:57PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 09:28 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:36:34PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> >> Memory I/O resources need to be marked as busy or else we cannot remove
> >> them when doing memory hot remove
On 08/01/2013 09:28 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:36:34PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
>> Memory I/O resources need to be marked as busy or else we cannot remove
>> them when doing memory hot remove.
>
> I would have thought it was the opposite?
Me too.
As it turns ou
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:36:34PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> Memory I/O resources need to be marked as busy or else we cannot remove
> them when doing memory hot remove.
I would have thought it was the opposite?
cheers
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing lis
Memory I/O resources need to be marked as busy or else we cannot remove
them when doing memory hot remove.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot
---
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
===
