On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 12:29 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 04:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:56 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Use the new MSR_64BIT in a few places. Some of these are
On Apr 9, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 04:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:56 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>
>>> Use the new MSR_64BIT in a few places. Some of these are already ifdef'ed
>>> for BOOKE vs BOOKS, but it's still clearer,
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 04:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:56 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > Use the new MSR_64BIT in a few places. Some of these are already ifdef'ed
> > for BOOKE vs BOOKS, but it's still clearer, MSR_SF does not immediately
> > parse as "MSR bit for 64bit".
>
On Apr 8, 2011, at 2:56 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Use the new MSR_64BIT in a few places. Some of these are already ifdef'ed
> for BOOKE vs BOOKS, but it's still clearer, MSR_SF does not immediately
> parse as "MSR bit for 64bit".
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kern
Use the new MSR_64BIT in a few places. Some of these are already ifdef'ed
for BOOKE vs BOOKS, but it's still clearer, MSR_SF does not immediately
parse as "MSR bit for 64bit".
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S |2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c |4 ++
