Hi Cyril,
On 06-10-2017 04:46, Cyril Bur wrote:
> [added by Cyril Bur]
> As the no-suspend firmware change is novel and untested using it should
> be opt in by users. Furthumore, currently the kernel has no method to
I forgot to mention on my last reply, but should s/Furthumore/Furthermore/ ?
Re
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 18:46 +1100, Cyril Bur wrote:
...
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
>> index 760872916013..2cb01b48123a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
>> @@
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 18:46 +1100, Cyril Bur wrote:
> [from Michael Neulings original patch]
> Each POWER9 core is made of two super slices. Each super slice can
> only have one thread at a time in TM suspend mode. The super slice
> restricts ever entering a state where both threads are in suspend
[from Michael Neulings original patch]
Each POWER9 core is made of two super slices. Each super slice can
only have one thread at a time in TM suspend mode. The super slice
restricts ever entering a state where both threads are in suspend by
aborting transactions on tsuspend or exceptions into the
