> On 09-Nov-2022, at 3:53 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 09-Nov-2022, at 2:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>
>> Em Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:07:06PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>>>
>>>
On 18-Oct-2022, at 2:26 PM, Athira Rajeev
wrote:
In perf stat wit
> On 09-Nov-2022, at 2:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> Em Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:07:06PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>>
>>
>>> On 18-Oct-2022, at 2:26 PM, Athira Rajeev
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In perf stat with CSV output option, number of fields
>>> in metrics output is not mat
Em Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:07:06PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>
>
> > On 18-Oct-2022, at 2:26 PM, Athira Rajeev
> > wrote:
> >
> > In perf stat with CSV output option, number of fields
> > in metrics output is not matching with number of fields
> > in other event output lines.
> >
> > Sam
> On 18-Oct-2022, at 2:26 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>
> In perf stat with CSV output option, number of fields
> in metrics output is not matching with number of fields
> in other event output lines.
>
> Sample output below after applying patch to fix
> printing os->prefix.
>
> # ./perf
In perf stat with CSV output option, number of fields
in metrics output is not matching with number of fields
in other event output lines.
Sample output below after applying patch to fix
printing os->prefix.
# ./perf stat -x, --per-socket -a -C 1 ls
S0,1,1.89,msec,cpu-clock,188769