On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 13:42 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:36:34 +1100 Michael Ellerman
> wrote:
>
> > Given that, I think it would be best if Andrew merged both of these patches.
> > Because this patch is pretty trivial, whereas the patch to mm/ is less so.
> >
> > Is that
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:36:34 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Given that, I think it would be best if Andrew merged both of these patches.
> Because this patch is pretty trivial, whereas the patch to mm/ is less so.
>
> Is that OK Andrew?
Yep, no probs.
__
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Li,
>
> On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 11:55 +0800, Li Zhang wrote:
>
>> From: Li Zhang
>>
>> Parallel initialisation has been enabled for X86, boot time is
>> improved greatly. On Power8, it is improved greatly for small
>> memory. Here is the
Hi Li,
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 11:55 +0800, Li Zhang wrote:
> From: Li Zhang
>
> Parallel initialisation has been enabled for X86, boot time is
> improved greatly. On Power8, it is improved greatly for small
> memory. Here is the result from my test on Power8 platform:
>
> For 4GB memory: 57% is i
From: Li Zhang
Parallel initialisation has been enabled for X86, boot time is
improved greatly. On Power8, it is improved greatly for small
memory. Here is the result from my test on Power8 platform:
For 4GB memory: 57% is improved, boot time as the following:
with patch: 10s, without patch: 24.
