On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 18:51 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> Le 14/09/2019 à 16:34, Scott Wood a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 12:50 +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > On mpc83xx with a QE, IMMR is 2Mbytes.
> > > On mpc83xx without a QE, IMMR is 1Mbytes.
> > > Each driver will map a part o
Le 14/09/2019 à 16:34, Scott Wood a écrit :
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 12:50 +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
On mpc83xx with a QE, IMMR is 2Mbytes.
On mpc83xx without a QE, IMMR is 1Mbytes.
Each driver will map a part of it to access the registers it needs.
Some driver will map the same part of IMM
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 12:50 +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On mpc83xx with a QE, IMMR is 2Mbytes.
> On mpc83xx without a QE, IMMR is 1Mbytes.
> Each driver will map a part of it to access the registers it needs.
> Some driver will map the same part of IMMR as other drivers.
>
> In order to reduc
On mpc83xx with a QE, IMMR is 2Mbytes.
On mpc83xx without a QE, IMMR is 1Mbytes.
Each driver will map a part of it to access the registers it needs.
Some driver will map the same part of IMMR as other drivers.
In order to reduce TLB misses, map the full IMMR with a BAT.
Signed-off-by: Christophe
