Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf_event: e500 support

2010-03-04 Thread Paul Mackerras
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:48:03AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > Paul do you intend to Ack this or don't care? Sorry, thought I had. Acked-by: Paul Mackerras ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/li

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf_event: e500 support

2010-03-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 25, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > This implements perf_event support for the Freescale embedded performance > monitor, based on the existing perf_event.c that supports server/classic > chips. > > Some limitations: > - Performance monitor interrupts are regular EE interrupts, and t

[PATCH 2/2] perf_event: e500 support

2010-02-25 Thread Scott Wood
This implements perf_event support for the Freescale embedded performance monitor, based on the existing perf_event.c that supports server/classic chips. Some limitations: - Performance monitor interrupts are regular EE interrupts, and thus you can't profile places with interrupts disabled. We