On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 20:58 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
>
> > When I changed irq_alloc_host() to take an of_node
> > (52964f87c64e6c6ea671b5bf3030fb1494090a48: "Add an
> > optional device_node pointer to the irq_host"),
> > I botched the reference counting semantics.
>
Michael Ellerman writes:
> When I changed irq_alloc_host() to take an of_node
> (52964f87c64e6c6ea671b5bf3030fb1494090a48: "Add an
> optional device_node pointer to the irq_host"),
> I botched the reference counting semantics.
>
> Stephen pointed out that it's irq_alloc_host()'s
> business if it
When I changed irq_alloc_host() to take an of_node
(52964f87c64e6c6ea671b5bf3030fb1494090a48: "Add an
optional device_node pointer to the irq_host"),
I botched the reference counting semantics.
Stephen pointed out that it's irq_alloc_host()'s
business if it needs to take an additional reference
to
