Re: [PATCH 14/16 v2] powerpc: expand vs demux ipi actions per message

2008-11-11 Thread Milton Miller
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:42 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: Milton Miller writes: With the new generic smp call function helpers, I noticed the code in smp_message_recv was a single function call in many cases. While getting the message number from the ipi data is easy, we can reduce the path length

Re: [PATCH 14/16 v2] powerpc: expand vs demux ipi actions per message

2008-11-05 Thread Paul Mackerras
Milton Miller writes: > With the new generic smp call function helpers, I noticed the code in > smp_message_recv was a single function call in many cases. While > getting the message number from the ipi data is easy, we can reduce > the path length by a function and data dependent switch by regis

[PATCH 14/16 v2] powerpc: expand vs demux ipi actions per message

2008-10-20 Thread Milton Miller
With the new generic smp call function helpers, I noticed the code in smp_message_recv was a single function call in many cases. While getting the message number from the ipi data is easy, we can reduce the path length by a function and data dependent switch by registering separate ipi actions for