Anshuman Khandual writes:
> On 08/12/2020 07:22 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> On 8/12/20 7:04 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/12/2020 06:46 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 8/12/20 6:33 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 08/12/2020 12:03 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrot
On 08/12/2020 07:22 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 8/12/20 7:04 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/12/2020 06:46 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> On 8/12/20 6:33 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/12/2020 12:03 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> The seems to be missing qu
On 8/12/20 7:04 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/12/2020 06:46 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 8/12/20 6:33 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/12/2020 12:03 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The seems to be missing quite a lot of details w.r.t allocating
the correct pgtable_t page (huge_pte_all
On 08/12/2020 06:46 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 8/12/20 6:33 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/12/2020 12:03 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> The seems to be missing quite a lot of details w.r.t allocating
>>> the correct pgtable_t page (huge_pte_alloc()), holding the right
>>> loc
On 8/12/20 6:33 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/12/2020 12:03 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The seems to be missing quite a lot of details w.r.t allocating
the correct pgtable_t page (huge_pte_alloc()), holding the right
lock (huge_pte_lock()) etc. The vma used is also not a hugetlb VMA.
ppc
On 08/12/2020 12:03 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> The seems to be missing quite a lot of details w.r.t allocating
> the correct pgtable_t page (huge_pte_alloc()), holding the right
> lock (huge_pte_lock()) etc. The vma used is also not a hugetlb VMA.
>
> ppc64 do have runtime checks within CONF
The seems to be missing quite a lot of details w.r.t allocating
the correct pgtable_t page (huge_pte_alloc()), holding the right
lock (huge_pte_lock()) etc. The vma used is also not a hugetlb VMA.
ppc64 do have runtime checks within CONFIG_DEBUG_VM for most of these.
Hence disable the test on ppc6
