On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:45:25PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
Hi Jann,
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:28 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:03 AM Jann Horn wrote:
> > >
> > > +locking maintainers
> >
> > Thanks! I'll CC the locking maintainers in the next posting.
> >
> > >
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:28 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Wed 18-01-23 09:36:44, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:11 AM 'Michal Hocko' via kernel-team
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed 18-01-23 14:23:32, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:28 PM Michal Hocko wr
On Wed 18-01-23 09:36:44, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:11 AM 'Michal Hocko' via kernel-team
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 18-01-23 14:23:32, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:28 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Tue 17-01-23 19:02:55, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > > > +
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 7:11 AM 'Michal Hocko' via kernel-team
wrote:
>
> On Wed 18-01-23 14:23:32, Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:28 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 17-01-23 19:02:55, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > > +locking maintainers
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:54 PM
On Wed 18-01-23 14:23:32, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:28 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 17-01-23 19:02:55, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > +locking maintainers
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:54 PM Suren Baghdasaryan
> > > wrote:
> > > > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be use
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:28 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 17-01-23 19:02:55, Jann Horn wrote:
> > +locking maintainers
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:54 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> > > instead of mmap_lock. Becau
...
> > One thing that might be gnarly here is that I think you might not be
> > allowed to use up_read() to fully release ownership of an object -
> > from what I remember, I think that up_read() (unlike something like
> > spin_unlock()) can access the lock object after it's already been
> > acqui
On Tue 17-01-23 19:02:55, Jann Horn wrote:
> +locking maintainers
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:54 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> > instead of mmap_lock. Because there are cases when multiple VMAs need
> > to be exclusively
On Tue 17-01-23 21:54:58, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:21:47PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:12 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue 17-01-23 16:04:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:36:47PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:46 PM Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:28 PM Suren Baghdasaryan
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:03 AM Jann Horn wrote:
> > > > One thing that might be gnarly here is that I
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:46 PM Jann Horn wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:28 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:03 AM Jann Horn wrote:
> > >
> > > +locking maintainers
> >
> > Thanks! I'll CC the locking maintainers in the next posting.
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:54 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:21:47PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:12 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue 17-01-23 16:04:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrot
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 01:21:47PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:12 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 17-01-23 16:04:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:28 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:03 AM Jann Horn wrote:
> >
> > +locking maintainers
>
> Thanks! I'll CC the locking maintainers in the next posting.
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:54 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > Introduce a per-VM
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:03 AM Jann Horn wrote:
>
> +locking maintainers
Thanks! I'll CC the locking maintainers in the next posting.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:54 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> > instead of mmap_loc
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:12 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Tue 17-01-23 16:04:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> > > instead of mmap_lock. Because there are cases when multip
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:07 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 5986817f393c..c026d75108b3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vm_a
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:04 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> > instead of mmap_lock. Because there are cases when multiple VMAs need
> > to be exclusively locked during VMA t
+locking maintainers
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:54 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> instead of mmap_lock. Because there are cases when multiple VMAs need
> to be exclusively locked during VMA tree modifications, instead of the
>
On Tue 17-01-23 16:04:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> > instead of mmap_lock. Because there are cases when multiple VMAs need
> > to be exclusively locked during VMA tree modif
On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 5986817f393c..c026d75108b3 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vm_area_dup(struct vm_area_struct
> *orig)
>*/
>
On Mon 09-01-23 12:53:07, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
> instead of mmap_lock. Because there are cases when multiple VMAs need
> to be exclusively locked during VMA tree modifications, instead of the
> usual lock/unlock patter we
Introduce a per-VMA rw_semaphore to be used during page fault handling
instead of mmap_lock. Because there are cases when multiple VMAs need
to be exclusively locked during VMA tree modifications, instead of the
usual lock/unlock patter we mark a VMA as locked by taking per-VMA lock
exclusively and
23 matches
Mail list logo
