On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 01:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> From: Scott Wood
>>>
>>> DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type.
>>>
>>> There is an existing set of arbitrary number
On 03/21/2012 01:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> From: Scott Wood
>>
>> DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type.
>>
>> There is an existing set of arbitrary numbers that Linux passes,
>> but it's an undocumented mess that so
On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> From: Scott Wood
>
> DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type.
>
> There is an existing set of arbitrary numbers that Linux passes,
> but it's an undocumented mess that sort of corresponds to server/classic
> exception vect
From: Scott Wood
DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type.
There is an existing set of arbitrary numbers that Linux passes,
but it's an undocumented mess that sort of corresponds to server/classic
exception vectors but not really.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
Signed-off-by: Alex