Re: [PATCH 1/9] qe/muram dts: Explicitly set address-cells and size cells for muram

2008-01-28 Thread Paul Gortmaker
Kumar Gala wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > >> Currently there are several dts that don't specify address or size >> cells for the muram. This causes dtc to use default values, one of >> which is an address-cells of two, and this breaks the parsing of the >> muram ranges,

Re: [PATCH 1/9] qe/muram dts: Explicitly set address-cells and size cells for muram

2008-01-28 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Currently there are several dts that don't specify address or size > cells for the muram. This causes dtc to use default values, one of > which is an address-cells of two, and this breaks the parsing of the > muram ranges, which is assuming an address-

[PATCH 1/9] qe/muram dts: Explicitly set address-cells and size cells for muram

2008-01-27 Thread Paul Gortmaker
Currently there are several dts that don't specify address or size cells for the muram. This causes dtc to use default values, one of which is an address-cells of two, and this breaks the parsing of the muram ranges, which is assuming an address-cells of one. For example: Warning (reg_format): "r