Re: [PATCH 1/8] fix bootmem reservation on uninitialized node

On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 09:14 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Dave Hansen writes: > > This patch ensures that we do not touch bootmem for any node which > > has not been initialized. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So, should I be sending this to Linus for 2.6.28? Yes, th

Re: [PATCH 1/8] fix bootmem reservation on uninitialized node

Paul Mackerras wrote: Dave Hansen writes: This patch ensures that we do not touch bootmem for any node which has not been initialized. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So, should I be sending this to Linus for 2.6.28? I notice you have added a dbg() call. For a 2.6.28

Re: [PATCH 1/8] fix bootmem reservation on uninitialized node

Dave Hansen writes: > This patch ensures that we do not touch bootmem for any node which > has not been initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So, should I be sending this to Linus for 2.6.28? I notice you have added a dbg() call. For a 2.6.28 patch I'd somewhat prefer

[PATCH 1/8] fix bootmem reservation on uninitialized node

careful_allocation() was calling into the bootemem allocator for nodes which had not been fully initialized and caused a previous bug. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/10528/ So, I merged a few broken out loops in do_init_bootmem() to fix it. That changed the code ordering. I think this bug i