On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
>
>>> +#else
>>> +#define generic_rtc_ops *(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> static int __init generic_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct rtc_device *rtc;
>>> + c
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
>> +#else
>> +#define generic_rtc_ops *(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL
>> +#endif
>>
>> static int __init generic_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>> {
>> struct rtc_device *rtc;
>> + const struct rtc_class_ops *ops;
>> +
>> + ops = dev_get_platd
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 09:57:27 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > @@ -33,13 +35,21 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops generic_rtc_ops = {
> > .read_time = generic_get_time,
> > .set_time = generic_set_time,
> > };
> > +#else
> > +#define generic_rtc_ops *(struct rtc_class_ops*)NU
Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> There are four architectures using this driver, but since we can
> build it with COMPILE_TEST, we should try dealing with the absence
> of the asm/rtc.h header file, to avoid getting a build error:
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-generic.c:12:21
There are four architectures using this driver, but since we can
build it with COMPILE_TEST, we should try dealing with the absence
of the asm/rtc.h header file, to avoid getting a build error:
drivers/rtc/rtc-generic.c:12:21: fatal error: asm/rtc.h: No such file or
directory
This creates an alt
