Hello Michael,
On 10/30/2014 09:15 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 01:00 -0500, Emil Medve wrote:
>> On 09/17/2014 07:15 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>>> At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
>>> allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator rem
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 01:00 -0500, Emil Medve wrote:
> On 09/17/2014 07:15 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
> > allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
> > complicated code (most of which I owe the dubiou
Hello Anton,
On 09/17/2014 07:15 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
> allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
> complicated code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being
> responsible for writing).
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
complicated code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being
responsible for writing).
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
Tested-by: Emil Medve
---
arch/powe
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Gitting rid of the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of
complicated code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being
responsible for writing).
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig
At the moment we transition from the memblock alloctor to the bootmem
allocator. Removing the bootmem allocator removes a bunch of complicated
code (most of which I owe the dubious honour of being responsible for
writing).
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
---
Index: b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
