On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:47 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> The majority of irq_host implementations (3 out of 4) are associated
> with a device_node, and need to stash it somewhere. Rather than having
> it somewhere different for each host, add an optional device_node pointer
> to the irq_host st
The majority of irq_host implementations (3 out of 4) are associated
with a device_node, and need to stash it somewhere. Rather than having
it somewhere different for each host, add an optional device_node pointer
to the irq_host structure.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
The majority of irq_host implementations (3 out of 4) are associated
with a device_node, and need to stash it somewhere. Rather than having
it somewhere different for each host, add an optional device_node pointer
to the irq_host structure.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
