On 05/04/2018 01:13 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 12:41 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Cédric Le Goater writes:
>>
>>> The kexec_state KEXEC_STATE_IRQS_OFF barrier is reached by all
>>> secondary CPUs before the kexec_cpu_down() operation is called on
>>> secondaries. This can raise
On 05/04/2018 12:41 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Cédric Le Goater writes:
>
>> The kexec_state KEXEC_STATE_IRQS_OFF barrier is reached by all
>> secondary CPUs before the kexec_cpu_down() operation is called on
>> secondaries. This can raise conflicts and provoque errors in the XIVE
>> hcalls wh
Cédric Le Goater writes:
> The kexec_state KEXEC_STATE_IRQS_OFF barrier is reached by all
> secondary CPUs before the kexec_cpu_down() operation is called on
> secondaries. This can raise conflicts and provoque errors in the XIVE
> hcalls when XIVE is shutdowned with H_INT_RESET on the primary CP
The kexec_state KEXEC_STATE_IRQS_OFF barrier is reached by all
secondary CPUs before the kexec_cpu_down() operation is called on
secondaries. This can raise conflicts and provoque errors in the XIVE
hcalls when XIVE is shutdowned with H_INT_RESET on the primary CPU.
To synchronize the kexec_cpu_do