Domen Puncer writes:
> 52xx
> Reason for adding it to all was that EXPORT_SYMBOL's would clash if
> one were to add clk support for another platform.
What I meant was, why aren't you using a config symbol so that we
don't build it on platforms that don't need any "clk" support at all?
Paul.
On 19/09/07 13:47 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Domen Puncer writes:
>
> > Paul, what do you say about this?
> > Sylvain suggested it could also be integrated with define_machine
> > interface.
>
> As it stands, your patch adds the clk_* functions on all platforms.
> What platforms would actuall
Domen Puncer writes:
> Paul, what do you say about this?
> Sylvain suggested it could also be integrated with define_machine
> interface.
As it stands, your patch adds the clk_* functions on all platforms.
What platforms would actually want to use them?
Paul.
Hi!
Paul, what do you say about this?
Sylvain suggested it could also be integrated with define_machine
interface.
If it's OK, it would be cool if it got merged in next release cycle.
Domen
On 11/07/07 11:32 +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> clk interface for arch/powerpc, platforms should
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:32:13PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > > > It doesn't make any assumption on struct clk, it's just a
> > > > wrapper around functions from clk.h.
>
On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > > It doesn't make any assumption on struct clk, it's just a
> > > wrapper around functions from clk.h.
> > > Point of this patch was to abstract exported functions, since
> > >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > It doesn't make any assumption on struct clk, it's just a
> > wrapper around functions from clk.h.
> > Point of this patch was to abstract exported functions, since
> > arch/powerpc/ can support multiple platfroms in one binary.
>
>
On 13/07/07 11:12 +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> On 11/07/07 21:34 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:02:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > >
On 11/07/07 21:34 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:02:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > > Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implem
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Russell King wrote:
>
> IOW, talk to me and I'll talk back. Ignore me and I'll ignore them.
Exactly why I cc'd you ... if folk want any more sharable
cross-platform code than just the clk.h interface, I expect
you'll have useful comments.
- Dave
__
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:02:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
> > > > the clk_ functions. Please, plea
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
> > > the clk_ functions. Please, please put it into common code.
> > >
> > > And talk to the mips folks whic
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:56:58AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
> > the clk_ functions. Please, please put it into common code.
> >
> > And talk to the mips folks which just got a similar comment from me.
>
> You mean like a lib
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:32:20AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > clk interface for arch/powerpc, platforms should fill
> > clk_functions.
>
> Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
> the clk_ functions. Please, please
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:32:20AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> clk interface for arch/powerpc, platforms should fill
> clk_functions.
Umm, this is about the fifth almost identical implementation of
the clk_ functions. Please, please put it into common code.
And talk to the mips folks which just
clk interface for arch/powerpc, platforms should fill
clk_functions.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile|3 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/clock.c | 82
include/asm-powerpc/clk_interface.h | 20 +
16 matches
Mail list logo
