On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:42:42PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
>> After the primary vcpu changes vcore_state to VCORE_RUNNING, there is
>> very little chance to schedule to secondary vcpu. So if we change the
>
> Why do you say there is very l
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:42:42PM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
> After the primary vcpu changes vcore_state to VCORE_RUNNING, there is
> very little chance to schedule to secondary vcpu. So if we change the
Why do you say there is very little chance to run the secondary vcpu?
> code sequence aroun
After the primary vcpu changes vcore_state to VCORE_RUNNING, there is
very little chance to schedule to secondary vcpu. So if we change the
code sequence around set vcore_state to VCORE_RUNNING and disable
preemption, we lost little. But we simplify the entering logi, based on
the fact that if prim