On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:00:48PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Information about the pagesize and read-only-status may also come from
> the devicetree. Parse this data, too, and act accordingly. While we are
> here, change the initialization printout a bit. write_max is useful to
> know to detect
Hi Wolfram,
I seem to be mistaken. I retried "compatible=" and it did
all the right
things. I was mistaken that request_module() only takes the driver
name, at24 in this
case, and not all device names in the table_ids.
This pretty much makes my patch redundant. Thanks for helping me clear
things
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> As far as I could tell, using compatible = <24c64>; didn't load the right
>> module (module name is at24) and using at24 caused a device id mismatch
>> because at24 is not a known device ID. I could be wrong here and if so, I'd
>> ver
Hi,
> As far as I could tell, using compatible = <24c64>; didn't load the right
> module (module name is at24) and using at24 caused a device id mismatch
> because at24 is not a known device ID. I could be wrong here and if so, I'd
> very much like a source code hint as to why...
Have you tried
these patches
upstream.
Regards,
Stijn
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Wolfram Sang
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:00 PM
To: devicetree-disc...@ozlabs.org
Cc: linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] misc: at24: parse OF-data, too
Information about the pagesize and read-only
Information about the pagesize and read-only-status may also come from
the devicetree. Parse this data, too, and act accordingly. While we are
here, change the initialization printout a bit. write_max is useful to
know to detect performance bottlenecks, the rest is superfluous.
Signed-off-by: Wolf
