Re: [PATCH 1/2] update crypto node definition and device tree instances

2008-05-30 Thread Kim Phillips
On Fri, 30 May 2008 23:28:38 +0200 Segher Boessenkool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice cleanup! Just one thing... > > > +- compatible : Should contain entries for all compatible SEC > > versions, > > + high to low, e.g., "fsl,sec2.1", "fsl,sec2.0" > > *All* compatible versions? That

Re: [PATCH 1/2] update crypto node definition and device tree instances

2008-05-30 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Nice cleanup! Just one thing... +- compatible : Should contain entries for all compatible SEC versions, + high to low, e.g., "fsl,sec2.1", "fsl,sec2.0" *All* compatible versions? That's not really correct -- for example that would include *future* versions! The first entry should

Re: [PATCH 1/2] update crypto node definition and device tree instances

2008-05-29 Thread David Gibson
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:12:46PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > delete obsolete device-type property, delete model property > (use compatible property instead), prepend "fsl," to Freescale > specific properties. Add nodes to device trees that are missing them, > and fix broken property values in ot

[PATCH 1/2] update crypto node definition and device tree instances

2008-05-29 Thread Kim Phillips
delete obsolete device-type property, delete model property (use compatible property instead), prepend "fsl," to Freescale specific properties. Add nodes to device trees that are missing them, and fix broken property values in other trees. Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Docum