On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 11:48:25AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 08:08:18 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:38:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2013 10:00:44 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >> How muc
On 07/03/2013 08:08:18 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:38:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 10:00:44 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> How much overhead (space and time) is this really?
> >
> >The following is the
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:38:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 10:00:44 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> How much overhead (space and time) is this really?
> >
> >The following is the additional sections when relocatable is
> >ena
On 07/02/2013 10:00:44 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> How much overhead (space and time) is this really?
The following is the additional sections when relocatable is enabled
for
a p2020rdb board.
sectionsize
.dynsym 07
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 10:24:47 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:30:45PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 06/30/2013 02:33:10 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:47:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >> On 06/2
On 07/01/2013 10:24:47 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:30:45PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/30/2013 02:33:10 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:47:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 06/27/2013 08:36:37 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:30:45PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/30/2013 02:33:10 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:47:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 06/27/2013 08:36:37 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> >> On 06/2
On 06/30/2013 02:33:10 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:47:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 08:36:37 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2013 09:00:33 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >This is based on the codes in
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:52:20PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 08:36:37 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2013 09:00:33 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >This is based on the codes in the head_44x.S. Since we always
> >align to
>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:47:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 08:36:37 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 06/26/2013 09:00:33 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >> >This is based on the codes in the head_44x.S. Since we always
> >align to
>
On 06/27/2013 08:36:37 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 09:00:33 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >This is based on the codes in the head_44x.S. Since we always
align to
> >256M before mapping the PAGE_OFFSET for a relocatable kernel, we
a
On 06/27/2013 08:36:37 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 09:00:33 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >This is based on the codes in the head_44x.S. Since we always
align to
> >256M before mapping the PAGE_OFFSET for a relocatable kernel, we
a
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 09:00:33 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >This is based on the codes in the head_44x.S. Since we always align to
> >256M before mapping the PAGE_OFFSET for a relocatable kernel, we also
> >change the init tlb map to 256M size.
>
>
On 06/26/2013 09:00:33 PM, Kevin Hao wrote:
This is based on the codes in the head_44x.S. Since we always align to
256M before mapping the PAGE_OFFSET for a relocatable kernel, we also
change the init tlb map to 256M size.
Why 256M?
This tightens the alignment requirement for dynamic memstart.
This is based on the codes in the head_44x.S. Since we always align to
256M before mapping the PAGE_OFFSET for a relocatable kernel, we also
change the init tlb map to 256M size.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_ent
15 matches
Mail list logo