Hello Wolfram,
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
-CONFIG_EEPROM_AT24=y
>>> NACK.
>> ... I did just the steps above mentioned, so this is
>> automagically done by "make mpc5200_defconfig" !
>
> Yes, I understood that, but I can't help it: it is still wrong. I need
> it.
Ok, than we need to
Hi Heiko,
> >> -CONFIG_EEPROM_AT24=y
> >
> > NACK.
>
> ... I did just the steps above mentioned, so this is
> automagically done by "make mpc5200_defconfig" !
Yes, I understood that, but I can't help it: it is still wrong. I need
it.
Kind regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K.
Hello Wolfram,
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 07:13:00AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
>
> I'd say the two patches can be merged. Dunno what Grant prefers whom you
> should
> CC as he is the maintainer.
I prefer the split in two patches, so we can
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 07:13:00AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
I'd say the two patches can be merged. Dunno what Grant prefers whom you should
CC as he is the maintainer.
> cc: Wolfram Sang
> cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> - based against 2.6.37-rc4
>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher
cc: Wolfram Sang
cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
---
- based against 2.6.37-rc4
- I did the following steps to generate this patch:
make mpc5200_defconfig
make savedefconfig
cp ./defconfig arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_defconfig
arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200
