Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: Fix false-positive probing

2010-07-07 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 20:57 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Since commit 18c6182bae0acca220ed6611f741034d563cd19f ("Rework > probing/JEDEC code"), m25p80 driver successfully registers chips > even if JEDEC probing fails. > > This was needed to support non-JEDEC flashes. Though, it appears > that s

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: Fix false-positive probing

2010-06-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:57, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Since commit 18c6182bae0acca220ed6611f741034d563cd19f ("Rework > probing/JEDEC code"), m25p80 driver successfully registers chips > even if JEDEC probing fails. > > This was needed to support non-JEDEC flashes. Though, it appears > that some p

[PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: Fix false-positive probing

2010-06-22 Thread Anton Vorontsov
Since commit 18c6182bae0acca220ed6611f741034d563cd19f ("Rework probing/JEDEC code"), m25p80 driver successfully registers chips even if JEDEC probing fails. This was needed to support non-JEDEC flashes. Though, it appears that some platforms (e.g. blackfin bf533 stamp[1]) used the old behavior to