Steve Capper writes:
> Can we not just add a:
> #define pgd_huge(pgd) (0)
> above the "#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */" line in the second patch?
> (or, more precisely, prevent the second patch from removing this line).
>
> That way we get a clearer code overall?
it is strange to have b
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:48:20PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Steve Capper writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:04:47PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> Update generic gup implementation with powerpc specific details.
> >> On powerpc at pmd level we can have hugepte, normal pmd point
Steve Capper writes:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:04:47PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Update generic gup implementation with powerpc specific details.
>> On powerpc at pmd level we can have hugepte, normal pmd pointer
>> or a pointer to the hugepage directory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh K
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:04:47PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Update generic gup implementation with powerpc specific details.
> On powerpc at pmd level we can have hugepte, normal pmd pointer
> or a pointer to the hugepage directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Hi,
This patch caus
Update generic gup implementation with powerpc specific details.
On powerpc at pmd level we can have hugepte, normal pmd pointer
or a pointer to the hugepage directory.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 1 +
include/linux/mm.h | 26 +++
mm/gup.c
