Re: [PATCH 1/2] ehea: fix delayed packet processing

2010-06-16 Thread David Miller
From: Jay Vosburgh Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:45:47 -0700 > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > >>In the eHEA poll function an rmb() is required. Without that some packets >>on the receive queue are not seen and thus delayed until the next interrupt >>is handled for the same receive queue. >> >>Signed-of

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ehea: fix delayed packet processing

2010-06-15 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: >In the eHEA poll function an rmb() is required. Without that some packets >on the receive queue are not seen and thus delayed until the next interrupt >is handled for the same receive queue. > >Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann To add a bit of background, this c

[PATCH 1/2] ehea: fix delayed packet processing

2010-06-15 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
In the eHEA poll function an rmb() is required. Without that some packets on the receive queue are not seen and thus delayed until the next interrupt is handled for the same receive queue. Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann --- Patch created against 2.6.35-rc3 drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |1