>
> It would be really preferable to support all those platforms in a
> single Linux
> image. If technically possible, please try to move this direction.
It is do-able for couple of SoCs. Other SoC DMA engines are quite a bit
different.
Let me first do small steps first and slowly achieve some run
On Friday 24 September 2010 00:39:47 Tirumala Marri wrote:
> > Will both versions of this driver exist in the same kernel build? For
> > example the iop-adma driver supports iop13xx and iop3xx, but we select
> > the archtitecture at build time? Or, as I assume in this case, will
> > the
> > two (
>
> Will both versions of this driver exist in the same kernel build? For
> example the iop-adma driver supports iop13xx and iop3xx, but we select
> the archtitecture at build time? Or, as I assume in this case, will
> the
> two (maybe more?) ppc4xx adma drivers all be built in the same image,
>
On 9/17/2010 6:42 PM, tma...@apm.com wrote:
From: Tirumala Marri
This patch generalizes the existing drver/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c, so that
common code can be shared between different similar DMA engine
drivers in other SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
---
drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c| 43
e: [PATCH 1/2] PPC4xx: Generelizing drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c
>
> Hi Tirumala,
>
> > drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c| 4370 +++-
> --
> > drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.h| 116 +-
> > drivers/dma/ppc4xx/ppc4xx-adma.h | 4020
> ++
Dear Tirumala Marri,
In message <7707889dee57e97ad50b4ce5c7697...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > > +/**
> > > + * ppc440spe_can_rxor - check if the operands may be processed with RXOR
> > > + */
> > > +static int ppc440spe_can_rxor(struct page **srcs, int src_cnt,
> > size_t len)
> >
> > Again,
Mr. Wolfgang
>
> Will this driver ever include any 40x processors? If not, you probably
> should use "44x" instead (here and everywhere in the rest of the
> code).
[Marri] Yes there is 40x based DMA engine we planned to include in the
future.
> > +/* Pointer to DMA0, DMA1 CP/CS FIFO */
> > +static
Hi Tirumala,
> drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c| 4370
> +++---
> drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.h| 116 +-
> drivers/dma/ppc4xx/ppc4xx-adma.h | 4020 +++
You've moved tons of code to the header file. Why?
Regards, Ilya.
_
Dear tma...@apm.com,
In message <1284774145-14543-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com> you wrote:
>
> This patch generalizes the existing drver/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c, so that
> common code can be shared between different similar DMA engine
> drivers in other SoCs.
...
> * This driver supports the async
