On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 13:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:50:04 +1000
>
> > It would be handy to be able to just do something like
> >
> > of_set_property(node, name, ptr, len);
> >
> > However, that wouldn't help much with the alloc
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 07:50:06 +1000
> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 27 May 2013 21:50:04 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> > However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
>> > though at least it would be eas
On 05/27/2013 11:50 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 27 May 2013 21:50:04 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
though at least it would be easier to use. It could also
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 27 May 2013 21:50:04 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
> > though at least it would be easier to use. It could also *try* to re-use
> > the current allocation if th
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:50:04 +1000
> It would be handy to be able to just do something like
>
> of_set_property(node, name, ptr, len);
>
> However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
> though at least it would be easier to use. It cou
On Monday 27 May 2013 21:50:04 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
> though at least it would be easier to use. It could also *try* to re-use
> the current allocation if the new content is of smaller or equal size.
I thought that dtc t
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 12:24 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > There is an of_update_property(), we could change the name though,
> yours
> > is nicer :-)
>
> Ben, David,
>
> I had a quick look at sparc's of_set_property. Nothing special except
> it
> depends on OF_DYNAMIC at some place. Usi
On 05/27/13 11:39, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 02:23 -0700, David Miller wrote:
Sparc has an of_set_property(), it needs to become generic.
There is an of_update_property(), we could change the name though, yours
is nicer :-)
Ben, David,
I had a quick look at sparc's
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 02:23 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Sparc has an of_set_property(), it needs to become generic.
There is an of_update_property(), we could change the name though, yours
is nicer :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linux
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 22:06 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> good you mention it. I added Grant on Cc and will give a short
> sum-up why I casted the const from property->value away here.
>
> Maybe I overlooked the API for modifying the DT property but as
> far as I've seen - there is no API
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 22:06:58 +0200
> good you mention it. I added Grant on Cc and will give a short
> sum-up why I casted the const from property->value away here.
>
> Maybe I overlooked the API for modifying the DT property but as
> far as I've seen - there is no
On 05/26/2013 06:04 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 22:04:01 +0200
+ memcpy((void *)p->value, reg, 6);
This cast is completely unnecessary, non-void to void pointer casts
are automatic.
If it is necessary, because p->value is c
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 22:04:01 +0200
> + memcpy((void *)p->value, reg, 6);
This cast is completely unnecessary, non-void to void pointer casts
are automatic.
If it is necessary, because p->value is const, then you are trying
to change something b
Kirkwood ethernet controllers suffer from loosing MAC register content
on gated clocks. In the past this was prevented by not gating the ethernet
controller clocks. With DT support for mv643xx_eth and corresponding
nodes available, a different approach is more reasonable.
This patch replaces the f
14 matches
Mail list logo
