Re: [PATCH 09/20] bootwrapper: Declare udelay() in ops.h.

2007-08-21 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:12:08AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:39:55PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > >>Declarations in various users are removed. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Hrm... it should go in a header,

Re: [PATCH 09/20] bootwrapper: Declare udelay() in ops.h.

2007-08-21 Thread Scott Wood
David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:39:55PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >>Declarations in various users are removed. >> >>Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Hrm... it should go in a header, certainly, but I wonder if io.h would > be more suitable than the already rat

Re: [PATCH 09/20] bootwrapper: Declare udelay() in ops.h.

2007-08-20 Thread David Gibson
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:39:55PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Declarations in various users are removed. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hrm... it should go in a header, certainly, but I wonder if io.h would be more suitable than the already rather bloated ops.h. -- David Gibs

[PATCH 09/20] bootwrapper: Declare udelay() in ops.h.

2007-08-20 Thread Scott Wood
Declarations in various users are removed. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/boot/mpsc.c|1 - arch/powerpc/boot/mv64x60_i2c.c |2 -- arch/powerpc/boot/ops.h |1 + arch/powerpc/boot/prpmc2800.c |2 -- arch/powerpc/boot/serial.c |