On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 08:23:11AM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig
> > Sent: 17 August 2020 08:32
> >
> > Stop providing the possibility to override the address space using
> > set_fs() now that there is no need for that any more. To properly
> > handle the TASK_SIZE_MAX check
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 09:32:10AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Stop providing the possibility to override the address space using
> set_fs() now that there is no need for that any more. To properly
> handle the TASK_SIZE_MAX checking for 4 vs 5-level page tables on
> x86 a new alternative is
From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 17 August 2020 08:32
>
> Stop providing the possibility to override the address space using
> set_fs() now that there is no need for that any more. To properly
> handle the TASK_SIZE_MAX checking for 4 vs 5-level page tables on
> x86 a new alternative is introduced,
Stop providing the possibility to override the address space using
set_fs() now that there is no need for that any more. To properly
handle the TASK_SIZE_MAX checking for 4 vs 5-level page tables on
x86 a new alternative is introduced, which just like the one in
entry_64.S has to use the hardcoded
