On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 14:30 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
> > is unsafe.
>
> No it doesn't, it either requires tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock().
Well, currently
Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
is unsafe.
p.s. However, I'm not sure that calling os_kill_ptraced_process()
in the atomic context is correct. It seem to work, but please
take a closer look.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov
---
arch/um/kernel/reboot.c |3 +++
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 14:30 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
> is unsafe.
No it doesn't, it either requires tasklist_lock or rcu_read_lock().
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lis
Am 24.03.2012 11:30, schrieb Anton Vorontsov:
> Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
> is unsafe.
>
> p.s. However, I'm not sure that calling os_kill_ptraced_process()
> in the atomic context is correct. It seem to work, but please
> take a closer look.
os_kill_ptrace
