Re: [PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings

2014-10-07 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/07/14 11:59, David Daney wrote: > On 10/07/2014 09:31 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: >>> On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote: Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent and should thus not describe

Re: [PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings

2014-10-07 Thread David Daney
On 10/07/2014 09:31 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote: Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented in Linux

Re: [PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings

2014-10-07 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:21:11PM +0100, Rob Landley wrote: > On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent > > and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented > > in Linux. > > So your argument is that lin

Re: [PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings

2014-10-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent > > and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented > > in Linux. > > So your argument is that lin

Re: [PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings

2014-10-07 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent > and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented > in Linux. So your argument is that linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings should not be specific to Linux. Mer

Re: [PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings

2014-10-07 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:28:07AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent > and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented > in Linux. > > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Pawel Moll > Cc: Mark Rutland > Signed-off-by: Gu

[PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings

2014-10-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented in Linux. Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Pawel Moll Cc: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/as3722.txt | 3 +-- 1 f