On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:59:52AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14:51AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pa
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14:51AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
>> >> Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size t
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:07:46AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> 4. Either "b_res->flags & mask" or "type" to be used for window_alignment(),
>I don't think it's big deal because "b_res->flags & mask == type" for
>current implementation. However, I'm not sure I still need change it
>to "ty
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:38:18PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> > Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
> > alignment constraints for that b_res. And window_alignment(bus,
> > type) of your plat
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:14:51AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> >> Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
> >> alignment constraints for that b
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
>> Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
>> alignment constraints for that b_res. And window_alignment(bus,
>> type) of your platform used
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:03 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> Lets say we passed that 'type' flag to size the minimum
> alignment constraints for that b_res. And window_alignment(bus,
> type) of your platform used that 'type' information to
> determine whether to use the ali
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:16:59PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:57 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> > Hmm.. this code is not about determining what kind of segment the
> > platform is returning. This code is about using the right alignment
> > constraints for the type of s
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:57 +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> Hmm.. this code is not about determining what kind of segment the
> platform is returning. This code is about using the right alignment
> constraints for the type of segment from which resource will be
> allocated. right?
>
> b_res is the resourc
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:36:49PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:23:33PM +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:05:47PM +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:23:17AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> >> > The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and pb
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:05:47PM +0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:23:17AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() to
> > do resource (I/O, memory and prefetchable memory) reassignment
> > based on the minimal alignments for the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:23:17AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() to
> do resource (I/O, memory and prefetchable memory) reassignment
> based on the minimal alignments for the p2p bridge, which was
> retrieved by function window_alignment().
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:30:28PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The patch changes function pbus_size_io() and pbus_size_mem() to
> do resource (I/O, memory and prefetchable memory) reassignment
> based on the minimal alignments for the p2p bridge, which was
> retrieved by function pcibios_window_alig
13 matches
Mail list logo
