Hi Kevin,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:20:02 +0800 Kevin Hao wrote:
>
> I took a second look at this. It seems that there is a declaration of
> struct device_node in linux/device.h and there is also no access to the
> member of device_node in this driver. So we are safe to not include of.h here.
> That
Hi Kevin,
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:51:50 +0800 Kevin Hao wrote:
>
> That was my first thought, but the codes protected by the PPC_OF seem not
> ppc specific and should be safe for other archs which also support OF. So I
> drop the PPC_OF completely. Did I miss something?
Ah, ok.
> > > dp = pci_d
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 01:51:50PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/imsttfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/imsttfb.c
> > > index aae10ce74f14..91a80bb8f988 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/imsttfb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/imsttfb.c
> > > @@ -1470,7 +1470,6 @@ s
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 01:44:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:47:35 +0800 Kevin Hao wrote:
> >
> > The OF functionality has moved to a common place and be used by many
> > archs. So we don't need to depend on PPC_OF option any more. This is
> > a prepara
Hi Kevin,
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:47:35 +0800 Kevin Hao wrote:
>
> The OF functionality has moved to a common place and be used by many
> archs. So we don't need to depend on PPC_OF option any more. This is
> a preparation for killing PPC_OF.
I suspect that you want to do the PPC_OF -> PPC conver
The OF functionality has moved to a common place and be used by many
archs. So we don't need to depend on PPC_OF option any more. This is
a preparation for killing PPC_OF.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao
---
drivers/video/fbdev/imsttfb.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vi
