The current VFIO-on-POWER implementation supports only user mode
driven mapping, i.e. QEMU is sending requests to map/unmap pages.
However this approach is really slow, so we want to move that to KVM.
Since H_PUT_TCE can be extremely performance sensitive (especially with
network adapters where eac
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 15:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> For what? The three lines of comment in page-flags.h? ack :)
>
> Manipulating page->_count directly is considered poor form. Don't
> blame us if we break your code ;)
>
> Actually, the manipulation in realmode_get_page() duplicates the
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:22:59 +1000 Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Ping, anyone, please?
ew, you top-posted.
> Ben needs ack from any of MM people before proceeding with this patch. Thanks!
For what? The three lines of comment in page-flags.h? ack :)
Manipulating page->_count directly is con
Ping, anyone, please?
Ben needs ack from any of MM people before proceeding with this patch. Thanks!
On 07/16/2013 10:53 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> The current VFIO-on-POWER implementation supports only user mode
> driven mapping, i.e. QEMU is sending requests to map/unmap pages.
> Howeve
The current VFIO-on-POWER implementation supports only user mode
driven mapping, i.e. QEMU is sending requests to map/unmap pages.
However this approach is really slow, so we want to move that to KVM.
Since H_PUT_TCE can be extremely performance sensitive (especially with
network adapters where eac