From: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:10:12 +1000
> The only difference here is that Sparc uses strncmp to match compatibility
> names while PowerPC uses strncasecmp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTE
>> The only difference here is that Sparc uses strncmp to match
>> compatibility
>> names while PowerPC uses strncasecmp.
>
> Could we put a comment in saying that both should really just use
> strcmp(), and that this mechanism should go away once any
> compatibility
> issues are found and addr
Hi Scott,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:52:07 -0500 Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:10:12AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > The only difference here is that Sparc uses strncmp to match compatibility
> > names while PowerPC uses strncasecmp.
>
> Could we put a comm
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:10:12AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The only difference here is that Sparc uses strncmp to match compatibility
> names while PowerPC uses strncasecmp.
Could we put a comment in saying that both should really just use
strcmp(), and that this mechanism should go away
The only difference here is that Sparc uses strncmp to match compatibility
names while PowerPC uses strncasecmp.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 25 -
arch/sparc/kernel/prom.c | 21 -
arch/sparc
