On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 18:20 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 17:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > In theory the udbg console should be safe to call basically at any time
> > after boot. It does not need any per-cpu resources or for the cpu to be
> > online, as long a
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 17:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> In theory the udbg console should be safe to call basically at any time
> after boot. It does not need any per-cpu resources or for the cpu to be
> online, as long as there is a udbg_putc routine hooked up it should
> work. So it should
In theory the udbg console should be safe to call basically at any time
after boot. It does not need any per-cpu resources or for the cpu to be
online, as long as there is a udbg_putc routine hooked up it should
work. So it should be able to be marked as CON_ANYTIME.
Verifying this will take a bit
