On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 05:58:48PM +0100, Benjamin Stürz wrote:
> This replaces comments with C99's designated
> initializers because the kernel supports them now.
This commit description seems wrong to me. This patch doesn't include
use C99 designated initializers (or AFAICT any other language fe
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 08:23:31PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 5:58 PM Benjamin Stürz wrote:
> >
> > This replaces comments with C99's designated
> > initializers because the kernel supports them now.
>
> The change looks fine, but the comment looks misplaced, as enum in
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 5:58 PM Benjamin Stürz wrote:
>
> This replaces comments with C99's designated
> initializers because the kernel supports them now.
The change looks fine, but the comment looks misplaced, as enum initializers
are not c99 feature. Also, the named array and struct intializer
Em Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:58:48 +0100
Benjamin Stürz escreveu:
> This replaces comments with C99's designated
> initializers because the kernel supports them now.
Please:
1. Split this series per sub-system. It makes no sense to mailbomb all
subsystems for things that won't belong there;
2. Ad
