Re: [PATCH 01/13] sdhci: Add quirk for controllers with no end-of-busy IRQ

2009-02-22 Thread Ben Dooks
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:08 +0300 > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > From: Ben Dooks > > > > The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail > > to generate an INT_DATA_END after the transfer has completed and > > th

Re: [PATCH 01/13] sdhci: Add quirk for controllers with no end-of-busy IRQ

2009-02-21 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:08 +0300 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > From: Ben Dooks > > The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail > to generate an INT_DATA_END after the transfer has completed and > the bus busy state finished. > > Changes in e809517f6fa5803a5a1cd56026f0e2190fc1

[PATCH 01/13] sdhci: Add quirk for controllers with no end-of-busy IRQ

2009-02-20 Thread Anton Vorontsov
From: Ben Dooks The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail to generate an INT_DATA_END after the transfer has completed and the bus busy state finished. Changes in e809517f6fa5803a5a1cd56026f0e2190fc13d5c to use the new busy method are the cause of the behaviour change. Si

[PATCH 01/13] sdhci: Add quirk for controllers with no end-of-busy IRQ

2009-02-13 Thread Anton Vorontsov
From: Ben Dooks The Samsung SDHCI (and FSL eSDHC) controller block seems to fail to generate an INT_DATA_END after the transfer has completed and the bus busy state finished. Changes in e809517f6fa5803a5a1cd56026f0e2190fc13d5c to use the new busy method are the cause of the behaviour change. Si