Hi Andi, hi everyone,
thank you for reviewing and waiting. I had a small personal hiatus over
Easter but now I am back. This series needs another cycle, so no need to
hurry. I will address some of the review comments but not all. The
conversion (and API improvements) are some bigger tasks, so
inco
Hi Wolfram,
> > @Andi: are you okay with this approach? It means you'd need to merge
> > -rc2 into your for-next branch. Or rebase if all fails.
>
> I think it's a good plan, I'll try to support you with it.
Do you feel more comfortable if I take the patches as soon as
they are reviewd?
So far
Hi Wolfram,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:24:53PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Okay, we need to begin somewhere...
>
> Start changing the wording of the I2C main header wrt. the newest I2C
> v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
> appropriate terms. This first step r
Okay, we need to begin somewhere...
Start changing the wording of the I2C main header wrt. the newest I2C
v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
appropriate terms. This first step renames the members of struct
i2c_algorithm. Once all in-tree users are converted, the
