On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 11:07 +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > So additionally, I'd suggest:
> > 1. Instrument checkpatch.pl and make it err or warn on timestamps.
>
> This is patch 34/34 in this series: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/5/198
Yeah, great, did not notice, thanks!
> > 2. Probably instrume
On 5.4.2011 17:49, Greg KH wrote:
> Very nice stuff. Do you want to take the individual patches through one
> of your trees, or do you mind if the subsystem maintainers take them
> through theirs?
I'd leave it up to the subsystem maintainers. I'll check once the merge
window opens and send the re
On 5.4.2011 21:24, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
>>> modules from identical sources. Of course the
* Michal Marek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
> modules from identical sources. Of course the build is already
> deterministic in terms of behavior of the code, but the various
> timestamps embedded in the object files make it hard to c
* Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
> > > modules from identical sources. Of course the
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
> > modules from identical sources. Of course the build is already
> > deterministic in terms
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 03:29:19PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 05-04-2011 15:16, James Bottomley escreveu:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> this series makes it possible
Em 05-04-2011 15:16, James Bottomley escreveu:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
>>> modules from identical sources. Of course
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 08:49 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
> > modules from identical sources. Of course the build is already
> > deterministic in terms
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
> modules from identical sources. Of course the build is already
> deterministic in terms of behavior of the code, but the various
> timestamps embedded
Hi,
this series makes it possible to build bit-identical kernel image and
modules from identical sources. Of course the build is already
deterministic in terms of behavior of the code, but the various
timestamps embedded in the object files make it hard to compare two
builds, for instance to veri
11 matches
Mail list logo
