On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:47:35PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 07.10.14 19:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:35:07PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07.10.14 08:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 12:00 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote
On 07.10.14 19:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:35:07PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07.10.14 08:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 12:00 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 03.10.14 06:42, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:35:07PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 07.10.14 08:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 12:00 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03.10.14 06:42, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
On 07.10.14 08:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 12:00 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 03.10.14 06:42, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 12:00 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 03.10.14 06:42, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
> >> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointe
On 03.10.14 06:42, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
>> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is that device drivers can
>> potentially implement it rather th
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is that device drivers can
> potentially implement it rather than board files.
>
> Today on PowerPC we set pm_po
On 10/01/2014 04:44 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.14 01:28, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 01:21 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.14 00:39, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is
On 10/01/2014 02:25 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01.10.14 17:54, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01.10.14 16:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
The generic Linux framework t
On 02.10.14 01:28, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 01:21 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 02.10.14 00:39, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
called pm_po
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 01:21 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 02.10.14 00:39, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
> >> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is t
On 02.10.14 00:39, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
>> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is that device drivers can
>> potentially implement it rather than boa
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:27 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is that device drivers can
> potentially implement it rather than board files.
>
> Today on PowerPC we set pm_po
On 01.10.14 17:54, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01.10.14 16:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 01.10.14 16:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
> >> called pm_power_off.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> This is touching the same area as last night's
>> "[RFC PATCH 00/16] kernel: Add support for poweroff handler call chain"
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/30/575
>
> I agree, and I think your patch set is walking into a reasonable
> direction
On 01.10.14 16:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
>> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is that device drivers can
>> potentially implemen
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
> called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is that device drivers can
> potentially implement it rather than board files.
>
> Today on PowerPC we se
The generic Linux framework to power off the machine is a function pointer
called pm_power_off. The trick about this pointer is that device drivers can
potentially implement it rather than board files.
Today on PowerPC we set pm_power_off to invoke our generic full machine power
off logic which th
19 matches
Mail list logo