Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:16:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > Since SLOB was removed and since > commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from > kmem_cache_destroy()"), > it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs > kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() directly. >

Re: [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:16:47 +0200 you wrote: > Since SLOB was removed and since > commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from > kmem_cache_destroy()"), > it is not necessary to use call_rcu when

Re: [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Simon Wunderlich : On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:16:47 +0200 you wrote: > Since SLOB was removed and since > commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from > kmem_cache_destroy()"), > it is not necessary to use call_rcu whe

Re: [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:16:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > Since SLOB was removed and since > commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from > kmem_cache_destroy()"), > it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs > kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() direc

Re: [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

On 10/13/24 22:16, Julia Lawall wrote: > Since SLOB was removed and since > commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from > kmem_cache_destroy()"), > it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs > kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() directly. > > The changes w

Re: [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:16:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > Since SLOB was removed and since > commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from > kmem_cache_destroy()"), > it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs > kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() direc

Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:16:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > Since SLOB was removed and since > commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from > kmem_cache_destroy()"), > it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs > kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() directly.

[PATCH 00/17] replace call_rcu by kfree_rcu for simple kmem_cache_free callback

Since SLOB was removed and since commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from kmem_cache_destroy()"), it is not necessary to use call_rcu when the callback only performs kmem_cache_free. Use kfree_rcu() directly. The changes were done using the following Coccinelle semantic patc