2017-11-30 12:20+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 30/11/2017 10:33, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> >
> > It was reverted in 785373b4c38719f4af6775845df6be1dfaea120f after which
> > the symptoms disappeared until this series was merged, which contains
> >
> > 369ea8242c0fb5239b4ddf0dc568f694bd244de4 mm/rmap
On 30/11/2017 10:33, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>
> It was reverted in 785373b4c38719f4af6775845df6be1dfaea120f after which
> the symptoms disappeared until this series was merged, which contains
>
> 369ea8242c0fb5239b4ddf0dc568f694bd244de4 mm/rmap: update to new mmu_notifier
> semantic v2
>
> W
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:54:34PM -0400, Jérôme Glisse wrote:
> (Sorry for so many list cross-posting and big cc)
Ditto (trimmed it a bit already, feel free to limit replies as you see
fit).
>
> Please help testing !
>
Kernels 4.13 and 4.14 (which both contain these patch series in its
final
taskboxtes...@gmail.com liked your message with Boxer for Android.
On Sep 1, 2017 10:48 AM, Jeff Cook wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:56:15PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > I will wait for people to test and for result of my own test
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:56:15PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > I will wait for people to test and for result of my own test before
> > reposting if need be, otherwise i will post as separate patch.
> >
> > > But from a _very_ quick read-
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:25PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Jérôme Glisse (13):
> dax: update to new mmu_notifier semantic
> mm/rmap: update to new mmu_notifier semantic
> powerpc/powernv: update to new mmu_notifier semantic
> drm/amdgpu: update to new mmu_notifier semantic
> IB/umem
From: Jérôme Glisse
(Sorry for so many list cross-posting and big cc)
Changes since v1:
- remove more dead code in kvm (no testing impact)
- more accurate end address computation (patch 2)
in page_mkclean_one and try_to_unmap_one
- added tested-by/reviewed-by gotten so far
Tested as b
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:56:15PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> I will wait for people to test and for result of my own test before
> reposting if need be, otherwise i will post as separate patch.
>
> > But from a _very_ quick read-through this looks fine. But it obviously
> > needs testing.
> >
On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 20:56 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:11:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > People - *especially* the people who saw issues under KVM - can you
> > try out Jérôme's patch-series? I aded some people to the cc, the full
> > series is on lkml. Jérôm
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:11:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Jérôme Glisse wrote:
> >
> > Note this is barely tested. I intend to do more testing of next few days
> > but i do not have access to all hardware that make use of the mmu_notifier
> > API.
>
> Than
(Sorry for so many list cross-posting and big cc)
Please help testing !
The invalidate_page callback suffered from 2 pitfalls. First it used to
happen after page table lock was release and thus a new page might have
been setup for the virtual address before the call to invalidate_page().
This is
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Jérôme Glisse wrote:
>
> Note this is barely tested. I intend to do more testing of next few days
> but i do not have access to all hardware that make use of the mmu_notifier
> API.
Thanks for doing this.
> First 2 patches convert existing call of mmu_notifier_in
12 matches
Mail list logo
