Scott Wood wrote on 18/11/2009 22:58:26:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Yeah, those are the ones that will trigger a dcbX TLB fault,
> > copy_tofrom_user would be my guess. Perhaps I missed something
> > in the conversions? That is, maybe some of these routines are plain wrong
> > now for
> > 8x
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yeah, those are the ones that will trigger a dcbX TLB fault,
copy_tofrom_user would be my guess. Perhaps I missed something
in the conversions? That is, maybe some of these routines are plain wrong now
for
8xx due to some other bug?
A small test program in user space doin
Scott Wood wrote on 18/11/2009 22:08:24:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Scott Wood wrote on 17/11/2009 01:40:11:
> >> No... I only meant that the ITLB pinning got rid of the boot hang.
> >>
> >> When I mentioned the EFAULTs before you said, "No surprise as the it
> >> seems like the DAR decodin
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Scott Wood wrote on 17/11/2009 01:40:11:
No... I only meant that the ITLB pinning got rid of the boot hang.
When I mentioned the EFAULTs before you said, "No surprise as the it
seems like the DAR decoding is broken." I thought you meant you'd found
a bug and fixed it
Scott Wood wrote on 17/11/2009 01:40:11:
> From:
>
> Scott Wood
>
> To:
>
> Joakim Tjernlund
>
> Cc:
>
> "linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org" , Rex Feany
>
>
> Date:
>
> 17/11/2009 01:40
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [PATCH 00/10] Fix 8xx M
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Scott Wood wrote on 16/11/2009 22:27:41:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:00:09PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:09:27PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
[I used the wrong branch, this will hopefully not conflict]
This is hopfully the last iteration of th
Scott Wood wrote on 16/11/2009 22:27:41:
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:00:09PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:09:27PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > [I used the wrong branch, this will hopefully not conflict]
> > >
> > > This is hopfully the last iteration of the se
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:00:09PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:09:27PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > [I used the wrong branch, this will hopefully not conflict]
> >
> > This is hopfully the last iteration of the series.
> > Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
> > C
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:09:27PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> [I used the wrong branch, this will hopefully not conflict]
>
> This is hopfully the last iteration of the series.
> Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
> Changes since last version:
> - Added mandatory pinning of iTLB
> - Add
[I used the wrong branch, this will hopefully not conflict]
This is hopfully the last iteration of the series.
Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
Changes since last version:
- Added mandatory pinning of iTLB
- Added "DTLB Miss cleanup"
Joakim Tjernlund (10):
8xx: invalidate non present TLB
This is hopfully the last iteration of the series.
Rex & Scott, please test and signoff.
Changes since last version:
- Added mandatory pinning of iTLB
- Added "DTLB Miss cleanup"
Joakim Tjernlund (10):
8xx: invalidate non present TLBs
8xx: Update TLB asm so it behaves as linux mm expects.
11 matches
Mail list logo
