On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 12:55 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 03:36:24PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 22:45 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> > > This set of patches de-couples the idea that there is a single
> > > directory in sysfs for each memory sec
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 03:36:24PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 22:45 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> > This set of patches de-couples the idea that there is a single
> > directory in sysfs for each memory section. The intent of the
> > patches is to reduce the numb
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 22:45 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> This set of patches de-couples the idea that there is a single
> directory in sysfs for each memory section. The intent of the
> patches is to reduce the number of sysfs directories created to
> resolve a boot-time performance issue. On
This set of patches de-couples the idea that there is a single
directory in sysfs for each memory section. The intent of the
patches is to reduce the number of sysfs directories created to
resolve a boot-time performance issue. On very large systems
boot time are getting very long (as seen on pow
