Re: [PATCH 0/7] MPC52xx Bestcomm submission for 2.6.24

2007-09-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On 9/16/07, Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hello Paul, Hi everyone, >>> >>> This series of patch is mainly the bestcomm support for >>> the mpc5200. It was posted a while ago and received some >>> comments. Theses are all ad

Re: [PATCH 0/7] MPC52xx Bestcomm submission for 2.6.24

2007-09-17 Thread tnt
> On 9/16/07, Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello Paul, Hi everyone, >> >> This series of patch is mainly the bestcomm support for >> the mpc5200. It was posted a while ago and received some >> comments. Theses are all addressed here (afaik). > > Does this series supersede these pact

Re: [PATCH 0/7] MPC52xx Bestcomm submission for 2.6.24

2007-09-17 Thread Jon Smirl
On 9/16/07, Sylvain Munaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Paul, Hi everyone, > > This series of patch is mainly the bestcomm support for > the mpc5200. It was posted a while ago and received some > comments. Theses are all addressed here (afaik). Does this series supersede these pacthes out of

[PATCH 0/7] MPC52xx Bestcomm submission for 2.6.24

2007-09-16 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hello Paul, Hi everyone, This series of patch is mainly the bestcomm support for the mpc5200. It was posted a while ago and received some comments. Theses are all addressed here (afaik). The first few patch are more a preparation for what follows. (rheap module support & extended fields in psc st