Grant Likely wrote:
Okay, I'll take another hack at it. Unfortunately I've got a great
big unmaskable interrupt in the form of UDS next week, but I'll be
back on it the week after.
And I thought you were a NMI.
g.
Sebastian
___
Linuxppc-dev mail
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> > As for the mapping, I agree that the functionality is generally
>> > useful, I'm just not fond of the current implementation. I think it
>> > is more complex than it needs to be and I'm
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > As for the mapping, I agree that the functionality is generally
> > useful, I'm just not fond of the current implementation. I think it
> > is more complex than it needs to be and I'm not excited about bring it
> > over to the other architectur
> I completely agree that irq domains are a generically useful feature
> for architectures, and it should be made available. I also completely
> agree that it is orthogonal to device tree translations, which in a
> large part is why I've structured this series and the new code the
> way I have.
>
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:43:19AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > A lot of this series ends up being fixups to powerpc code; but the 4th
> > patch is of importance to every architecture using CONFIG_OF (except
> > SPARC, which has i
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> A lot of this series ends up being fixups to powerpc code; but the 4th
> patch is of importance to every architecture using CONFIG_OF (except
> SPARC, which has its own solution).
>
> This series (finally!) factors out device tree irq domain
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:16:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> >I'd really like to get patches 1-4 merged into 2.6.40. Please test.
> >I'm also running through build testing here, and when it's complete
> >I'll push it out to a 'devicetree/irq-domain' branch on
Grant Likely wrote:
I'd really like to get patches 1-4 merged into 2.6.40. Please test.
I'm also running through build testing here, and when it's complete
I'll push it out to a 'devicetree/irq-domain' branch on
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6
I pulled this, built and booted my x86-dt box
A lot of this series ends up being fixups to powerpc code; but the 4th
patch is of importance to every architecture using CONFIG_OF (except
SPARC, which has its own solution).
This series (finally!) factors out device tree irq domain decoding
from arch/powerpc and makes it generic for all architec
